At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison Record- ✓Age 18 years or older
- ✓Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements
- ✓Adequate oral hygiene to allow for implant therapy consistent with standards of care
- ✓Adequate bone volume to accommodate Straumann Bone Level implants RC 4.1mm or Bone Level Implant NC 3.3 mm at 8, 10, 12 or 14 mm in length
- ✕Current smoking with moderate or heavy use (more than 10 cigarettes per day) or tobacco chewing
- ✕History of alcoholism or drug abuse within past 5 years
- ✕Severe bruxism or clenching habits
- ✕Significant untreated periodontal disease (grade III or IV), caries, or clinical/radiographic infection within two adjacent tooth positions of implant area
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
In the news
3 articles- Sanofi wins type 1 diabetes nod for Tzield after requesting to revoke CNPVBioSpace·2026-06-15
- Belite Bio Completes Rolling Submission of New Drug Application to U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Tinlarebant for the Treatment of Stargardt Disease Type 1GlobeNewswire Biotech·2026-06-13press release
- #ADA26: Roche incretin shot works in mid-stage trial in type 1 diabetesEndpoints News·2026-06-05
Matched to this trial by ClinicalIndexfrom reputable biotech & medical press.
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Placement of a dental implant for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially and Acquired Absence of Single Tooth. Completed, enrolled 38 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue (gums) and bone (jawbone) healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios: 1. When the implant is placed at the same time the tooth is extracted. 2. When the tooth is extracted and then left to heal for a period of 4 to 8 weeks before the implant is placed. Previous studies have shown that both methods work and can give good results. In fact the two methods are used routinely as part of standard care but it is not known if the two procedures are equally good since they have never been compared in one same research study.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Type 1 implant placement Type 2 implant placement