CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 1,100 enrolled
Drug / intervention
C-MAC +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01632683
NCT01632683N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC D-blade to Glidescope Videolaryngoscope in the Predicted Difficult Airway

Oregon Health and Science University·interventional·Posted Jul 3, 2012·Updated Nov 30, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating C-MAC and Glidescope for Difficult Airway. Completed, enrolled 1,100 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study evaluates success rates of tracheal intubation (passing a breathing tube)for patients who may be more challenging to intubate while utilizing one of two devices that facilitate placement of the tube with video technology.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsDifficult Airway
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsUniversity of Iowa, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJul 3, 2012
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2013
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2014
Study CompletionAug 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 14.0 years ago

Interventions

C-MACdevice

C-MAC arm

Glidescopedevice

Glidescope arm