CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 84 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Surgery +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01662765
NCT01662765N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Prospective, Randomised, and Multicenter Clinical Trial

Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital·interventional·Posted Aug 10, 2012·Updated Feb 16, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Surgery and conservative for Pilonidal Sinus and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 84 participants across 5 sites.

Detailed Summary

The aim of the study was to compare the results of conservative and surgical treatment, to create an algorithm for the management of the disease, and gain more information about the etiology, pathogenesis, and course of the disease. The investigators hypothesise that surgical treatment of UPS will be better than conservative management in terms of recurrence rate, healing time, patient comfort and satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Sinus; Dermal, Pilonidal, Umbilical Granuloma
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
CollaboratorsZeugma Saglik Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti.

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedAug 10, 2012
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2003
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2010
Study CompletionMay 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6.5 yearsPosted 13.9 years ago

Interventions

Surgeryprocedure

modified umbilectomy

conservativeother

this treatment will include conservative procedures under local anesthesia for patient comfort.