At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 150 enrolled
Drug / intervention
central line placement +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guided Central Venous Access in Children
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating central line placement and Ultrasound for Need for Central Venous Access. Completed, enrolled 150 participants across 2 sites.
Detailed Summary
The investigators hypothesized that, in children undergoing venous cannulation for central line placement by pediatric surgeons, ultrasound-guided cannulation leads to an increase in successful venous cannulation at first attempt compared to landmark guided cannulation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsNeed for Central Venous Access
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartMay 2009
Primary CompletionDec 2011
First PostedSep 2012
TodayJul 2026
First PostedSep 7, 2012
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2009
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.6 yearsPosted 13.8 years ago
Interventions
central line placementprocedure
central line placement
Ultrasounddevice
Ultrasound guided central venous access