At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized (RCT) Study Comparing WallFlex® Esophageal Fully Covered (FC) Metal Stent to Bougie Dilation for the Treatment of Refractory Anastomotic Esophageal Strictures
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating WallFlex Esophageal RX Fully Covered Stent and Esophageal Bougie Dilator Per Investigator preference for Refractory Anastomotic Esophageal Strictures. Completed, enrolled 18 participants across 4 sites in 3 countries.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of temporary indwell of the WallFlex Esophageal FC Metal Stent to Bougie Dilation for the treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Temporary placement of the WallFlex Esophageal RX Fully Covered Stent for treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures. The stent will be removed after 8 weeks (plus or minus 7 days) indwell
Commercially available Esophageal Bougie Dilator Per Investigator preference