At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
In Brief
A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating CMAC videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscopy for Acute Respiratory Distress. Completed, enrolled 198 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Randomized controlled trial of intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus standard laryngoscopy. Patients who are going to be intubated using standard laryngoscopy will be randomized to have their first intubation attempt done using either standard laryngoscopy or the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Subsequent attempts will be at the discretion of the treating physician.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
patients are intubated using the CMAC video laryngoscope
Patients undergo their first intubation attempt using direct laryngoscopy with a C-MAC device with the video display covered with a hood.