CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 3Completed· 48 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Mirror therapy +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01735877
NCT01735877Phase 3Completed

Effectiveness of Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients With Unilateral Neglect - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India·interventional·Posted Nov 28, 2012·Updated Jun 30, 2014

In Brief

A Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating Mirror therapy and Control group for Hemispatial Neglect. Completed, enrolled 48 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Hemi spatial neglect, or the tendency to ignore stimuli originating in a portion of the environment contra lateral to a cerebral lesion, can be a major source of functional handicap after stroke. The currently available treatments for unilateral neglect are scanning training, visual cuing approaches, limb activation strategies, visual imagery, tactile stimulation, prisms and sustained attention training.Mirror therapy improves the hand function in sub-acute stroke. Hypothesis: To evaluate the effectiveness of Mirror therapy in the management of stroke patients with unilateral neglect.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesIndia
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 3CompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 28, 2012
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2011
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2013
Study CompletionAug 1, 2013
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.5 yearsPosted 13.6 years ago

Interventions

Mirror therapyother

During the mirror practices, patients were seated close to a table on which a mirror (35×35cm) was placed vertically. The practice consisted of non paretic-side wrist and finger flexion and extension movements while patients looked into the mirror, watching the image of their noninvolved hand, thus seeing the reflection of the hand movement projected over the involved hand. Patients could see only the noninvolved hand in the mirror; otherwise, the noninvolved hand was hidden from sight. During the session patients were asked to try to do the same movements with the paretic hand while they were moving the non paretic hand.

Control groupother

The control group performed the same exercises for the same duration but used the nonreflecting side of the mirror in such a way that the paretic hand was hidden from sight. The same therapist delivered the control therapy to the patients. Both the treatment and the control group received limb activation.