At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Subcuticular Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Section Skin Closure
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Subcuticular suture and Subcuticular staple for Surgical Wound. Completed, enrolled 220 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Currently, the way doctors close the skin during cesarean section is different between surgeons and there is little evidence to support the use of one kind of closure over the other. At the Mayo Clinic Family Birth Center, skin is currently closed using an absorbable suture (or stitch), placed within the top layer of skin. At other institutions, a metal staple is often used to close the skin. There is a new technique that uses special absorbable staples just beneath the skin. This technology may be equal to, or possibly better than, current skin closure techniques. However, there is currently little data to show how it compares. The purpose of this study is to compare the absorbable staple to the currently used absorbable suture. The data from this study will then be used to help determine the best technique for skin closure.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
subcuticular Monocryl suture closure
subcuticular staple wound closure with INSORB 20 device