CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 54 enrolled
Drug / intervention
DVT-3000 +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01779648
NCT01779648N/ACompleted

The Influence of the Different Ways of Pneumatic Compression on Clinical and Physiologic Efficacies in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Randomised Comparative Study

Seoul National University Hospital·interventional·Posted Jan 30, 2013·Updated May 1, 2013

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating DVT-3000 and SCD Express for Venous Thrombosis and Deep Vein Thrombosis. Completed, enrolled 54 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Various kinds of intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with particular ways of compression have been developed and used for prevention of deep vein thrombosis. There are still some controversies about the physiologic properties and clinical impact of numerous issues including the variety of the cuff length, inflation rate, compression sequence, compression-relaxation cycle rate, and pressure generation characteristics. This study is designed to compare clinical efficacies as well as venous hemodynamic improvements between Simultaneous bilateral compression with fixed venous refill time versus alternate compression with adjusted refill time

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSouth Korea

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 30, 2013
Enrollment StartMar 1, 2012
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2013
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 10 monthsPosted 13.4 years ago

Interventions

DVT-3000device

SCD Expressdevice