CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 65 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Standard planning radiotherapy +1 moreradiation
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01810757
NCT01810757N/ACompleted

A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study of HYpofractionated Bladder Radiotherapy With or Without Image Guided aDaptive Planning

Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom·interventional·Posted Mar 14, 2013·Updated Jan 15, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Standard planning radiotherapy and Adaptive planning radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer. Completed, enrolled 65 participants across 11 sites.

Detailed Summary

Background Localised muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is life-threatening and can cause significant symptoms. Around 50% of patients with MIBC who are referred for radiotherapy are unfit for standard radical treatment (surgery or daily radiotherapy with chemotherapy), but would have a normal life expectancy if their cancer were adequately controlled. Retrospective studies suggest that radiotherapy which is given weekly using fewer fractions and higher doses (hypofractionated), may be an alternative where daily radiotherapy is not an option. Radiotherapy treatment is planned based on information from a CT scan which shows the position and shape of the bladder. This plan needs to take into account the fact that the bladder's shape and position can change, depending on how full it is and because of where it is in relation to the bowel. A safety margin is therefore added around the bladder on the planned treatment, to reduce the risk of missing any of the bladder with the radiotherapy. It is now possible to take scans of the bladder's position before each treatment and adjust the position of the treatment plan accordingly to ensure the bladder is fully covered by it. In this study we are also looking at whether it is possible to design a series of treatment plans with different size safety margins and then choose one that fits best for each particular day. This is called 'adaptive radiotherapy'. This technique may enable accurate treatment delivery using smaller safety margins and this might help to reduce side effects. Aims In patients with MIBC not suitable for cystectomy or daily radiotherapy we aim to assess: 1. whether treatment using adaptive planning can be successfully delivered at multiple sites across the UK and results in acceptable levels of toxicity 2. the local tumour control rate achieved by hypofractionated weekly radiotherapy 3. the requirement to treat with adaptive planning. How results will be used Results will provide robust evidence for use of hypofractionated radiotherapy and assess whether this is a plausible and worthwhile treatment in this patient population. The randomised element of the trial will support the implementation of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer in the UK. HYBRID will provide evidence on the benefits or otherwise of this methodology and inform the development of further trials in this and other patient groups.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsBladder Cancer
CountriesUnited Kingdom
CollaboratorsCancer Research UK

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 14, 2013
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2014
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2016
Study CompletionApr 1, 2023
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.3 yearsPosted 13.3 years ago

Interventions

Standard planning radiotherapyradiation

36 Gray dose given in 6 fractions of 6 Grays over 6 weeks, using one plan per patient.

Adaptive planning radiotherapyradiation

36 Gray dose given in 6 fractions of 6 Grays over 6 weeks, selecting the best fit from three plans per patient.