At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Physiological Responses to Constant-load (Continuous) vs. Variable-intensity (Interval) During 14 Weeks of Supervised Aerobic Exercise on Active Men.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating running training for Exhaustion - Physiological. Completed, enrolled 35 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study was to verify physiological responses to constant-load (continuous) vs. variable-intensity (interval) during 14 weeks of aerobic exercise on active men. The hypothesis was that would be differences in physiological variables on distinct modes of execution performed on the treadmill over a period of 14 weeks of training.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The present study was designed to compare the physiological effects between the two training regimes and the control group.The subjects from interval and continuous group performed others activities as resistance training, swimming or soccer. Those activities wasn't controlled by our study, but the individual didn't do physical activities at least 3 hours before started our running sessions. The control group simply performed their normal physical activities (resistance training, swimming or soccer). But, each 3 weeks we had a contact with control group to check about any injury or illness that could affect the final results. None were found.