At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 181 enrolled
Drug / intervention
V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the V.A.C. Ulta Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System With V.A.C. VeraFlo Dressing System in Operatively Debrided Wounds
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation and V.A.C.Ulta without instillation for Wounds and Injuries. Completed, enrolled 181 participants across 7 sites.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the Veraflo with Prontosan vs VAC in wounds that require operative debridement.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsWounds and Injuries
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartMay 2013
First PostedJun 2013
Primary CompletionAug 2015
Study CompletionNov 2015
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJun 4, 2013
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2013
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2015
Study CompletionNov 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.3 yearsPosted 13.1 years ago
Interventions
V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillationdevice
NPWT with instillation of a wound cleanser (Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution)
V.A.C.Ulta without instillationdevice
NPWT only