At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 235 enrolled
Drug / intervention
ConforMIS iTotal® Knee Replacementdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Analysis of Procedure-related Costs and Proposed Benefits of the ConforMIS iTotal® Cruciate Retaining Knee Replacement System Versus Standard Total Knee
In Brief
An observational study evaluating ConforMIS iTotal® Knee Replacement for Osteoarthritis,Knee. Completed, enrolled 235 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the costs and benefits of the ConforMIS iTotal® total knee replacement system versus standard total knee arthroplasty. This study is designed to illustrate the difference in cost between standard total knee replacements and the ConforMIS iTotal at a single institution.
Study Details
Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsOsteoarthritis,Knee
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJul 2013
First PostedJul 2013
Primary CompletionMar 2014
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJul 15, 2013
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2013
Primary CompletionMar 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8 monthsPosted 13.0 years ago
Interventions
ConforMIS iTotal® Knee Replacementdevice
Patients that received a ConforMIS iTotal knee replacement versus other knee replacement devices.