CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 2Completed· 20 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Implant of amniotic membrane grafts +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01926535
NCT01926535Phase 2Completed

Comparative Analysis of Human Amniotic Membrane Graft Versus Contact Lenses in Syntomathic Bullous Keratopathy

Universidad de Valparaiso·interventional·Posted Aug 21, 2013·Updated Aug 26, 2013

In Brief

A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating Implant of amniotic membrane grafts and Therapeutic contact lenses for Bullous Keratopathy. Completed, enrolled 20 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The amniotic membrane (AM) is an avascular structure derived from fetus, which is a good choice for regenerative medicine and effective treatment in eye surface pathologies such as bullous keratopathy (BK). This disease generates a chronic corneal edema evolving to the production of vesicles and bullae, chronic eye pain and visual acuity decrease. Definitive treatment for those patients is corneal transplant; however, donation is not always available and thus requires long waiting times. The currently available palliative treatment consists in the use of contact lenses to prevent the corneal epithelium from falling. However, this may be associated with corneal neovascularization, lens displacement or loss, infections, and discomfort for the patient. The objective of this work was to compare the use of amniotic membrane grafts versus contact lenses in patients suffering from BK awaiting a corneal transplant. A randomized clinical trial assay was performed with patients with a clinical diagnosis of BK. Twenty patients were randomized into 2 groups: amniotic membrane and therapeutic contact lenses. Eye pain intensity (Analog visual scale), visual acuity (Snellen questioner), bullae and corneal epithelial defects presence, as well as corneal neovascularization and complications (biomicroscopy) were compared during 6 months.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesChile

Timeline

Phase 2CompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedAug 21, 2013
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2011
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2012
Study CompletionJun 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 12.9 years ago

Interventions

Implant of amniotic membrane graftsprocedure

Amniotic membrane grafts were implanted in the affected eyes using topical anesthesia. Each graft was sutured to the bulbar conjunctive tissue using 10-0 nylon sutures and a reinforcement stitch was applied at the cornea

Therapeutic contact lensesdevice

Therapeutic contact lenses were applied in all patients included in the control group and the lenses were replaced every two months according to the pre-established gold standard for this procedure.