CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 190 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Long Axis strategy +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01927185
NCT01927185N/ACompleted

Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma·interventional·Posted Aug 22, 2013·Updated Jan 25, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Long Axis strategy and Short Axis Strategy for Vascular Access Complication and Perioperative/Postoperative Complications. Completed, enrolled 190 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Central venous catheterization is commonly applied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The subclavian vein has lower risk of infection and provides more patients comfort. However central venous catheterization may results in complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax or arterial puncture. It has been suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance could improve the success rate, reduce the number of needle passes and decrease complications. Two different real-time 2-dimensional US techniques can be employed in the insertion of central venous catheters. The first technique involves real-time US-guided cannulation of subclavian vein using a long axis/in-plane approach. The second one involves real-time US-guided using a short axis/out-off-plane approach. However to date no studies have compared their efficacy and safety. The purpose of this study was to compare the US-guided long-axis versus short-axis approach for the SCV catheterization in adult critical care patients.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesItaly
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedAug 22, 2013
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2013
Primary CompletionMar 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.8 yearsPosted 12.9 years ago

Interventions

Long Axis strategydevice

With the long-axis approach the vein appeared in the longitudinal view. With this approach only the vein was visible on the screen. The needle was held at a 30° angle, oriented in-plane with the transducer and the skin punctured at the base of the transducer. The vessel alignment was maintained during the procedure and the entire length of the needle was visible during the progression through the tissues.

Short Axis Strategydevice

With the short-axis approach the probe was positioned almost perpendicularly to the clavicle. The needle was held at an angle of 45° relative to the skin surface and sagittal to the plane of the probe (out-of-plane). During the progression to the vessel, the visualization of the needle was limited to the deformation of tissue and artefacts produced by needle advancement. When the tip abutted the vein wall, additional pressure produced transient vessel deformation, which disappeared once the wall was penetrated.