At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 52 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Parasol Punctal Occluder +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
The Retention Rate Between Superflex Punctal Plugs, and Parasol Punctal Occluders
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Parasol Punctal Occluder and Superflex Punctal Occluder for Dry Eye. Completed, enrolled 52 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Parasol punctal occluders (Brand A) have a higher rate of retention than Superflex punctal plugs (Brand B).
Study Details
Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsDry Eye
CountriesCanada
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartSep 2013
First PostedSep 2013
Primary CompletionMay 2014
Study CompletionAug 2014
TodayJul 2026
First PostedSep 20, 2013
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2013
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2014
Study CompletionAug 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8 monthsPosted 12.8 years ago
Interventions
Parasol Punctal Occluderdevice
Patients will be randomized to receive one of these 2 punctal occluders in the management of dry eyes.
Superflex Punctal Occluderdevice
Patients will be randomized to receive one of these 2 punctal occluders in the management of dry eyes.