At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope: A Comparison of the Ease of Use During Intubation on Difficult Airways
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Intubation; Difficult. Completed, enrolled 41 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
We will conduct a randomized trial comparing the success rate and time to intubation using the RIFL vs. the fiberoptic bronchoscope, as the latter is commonly held to be the gold standard of difficult airway devices. Specifically, we wish to compare the of intubation between the two devices in patients with potentially difficult airways as defined by an oropharyngeal class 3-4, BMI greater than 35, or in patients with a history of difficult intubation using direct laryngoscopy.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Patients in the RIFL group will undergo bronchoscopy using the Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.
Patients in the control group will undergo bronchoscopy using the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.