CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 208 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Telephone Interpretation +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01986179
NCT01986179N/ACompleted

Impact of Remote Interpreter Modality on Comprehension, Communication Quality, and Consistency of Interpreter Use in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Seattle Children's Hospital·interventional·Posted Nov 18, 2013·Updated May 20, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Telephone Interpretation and Video Interpretation for Limited English Proficient Patients and Families. Completed, enrolled 208 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Professional interpretation improves quality of care for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). However, many health care settings lack access to professional interpreters, and even in locations with good access, logistical factors and perceived barriers have limited their widespread use. Remote methods of professional interpretation, including telephone and video, hold great promise for expanding access, but only limited data exist on the relative impacts of these modalities on patient care and provider uptake. Comparing how these modalities impact multiple aspects of health care quality, including family comprehension, provider communication, and consistency of provider interpreter use will inform dissemination of strategies for delivery of safe, efficient, and equitable care to LEP families. Aim 1: To determine whether randomly assigned remote interpreter modality (telephone versus video) impacts parent-reported quality of communication and interpretation, diagnosis comprehension, and length of stay (LOS) among LEP Spanish-speaking families seen in a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Hypothesis 1: Parent-reported quality of communication and interpretation and parent diagnosis comprehension will be higher among families assigned to video interpretation compared to telephone interpretation. Hypothesis 2: LOS will not differ between families assigned to video and telephone interpretation. Aim 2: To determine whether assigned interpreter modality is associated with provider decision to communicate without professional interpretation. Hypothesis 3: Parent-reported provider communication without professional interpretation (e.g. using the patient or a family member to interpret for some part of the visit) will be lower for families assigned to video interpretation compared to telephone interpretation.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 18, 2013
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2014
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 12.6 years ago

Interventions

Telephone Interpretationother

Professional interpretation provided over the phone by a national network of certified medical interpreters

Video Interpretationother

Professional interpretation provided over video by a national network of certified medical interpreters