CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 100 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Nominal T shock setting +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02027883
NCT02027883N/ACompleted

Comparison of Ventricular Fibrillation Induction Techniques During Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implant

James Merrill·interventional·Posted Jan 6, 2014·Updated May 22, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Nominal T shock setting and Educated T shock setting for Cardiomyopathy. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

As the indications for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator implantation expand, minimizing implant time is critical. Also, patients receiving biventricular ICDs are sometimes more unstable and minimization of sedation time is crucial. Multiple induction attempts, with a 1-Joule shock, can cause disruption in lead position. Therefore limiting the number of attempts will allow for better lead stability throughout the procedure and a more straightforward implant process. Investigator proposes a detailed documentation of success rates from various Ventriculart Fibrillation induction methods during implant of Medtronic defibrillation capable devices.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsCardiomyopathy
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsMedtronic

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 6, 2014
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2011
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.6 yearsPosted 12.5 years ago

Interventions

Nominal T shock settingdevice

Nominal Parameter Set 1 Programming Values for EnTrust

Educated T shock settingdevice

Experimental Parameter Set 2 Programming Values