CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 78 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Length of Second Stageother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02101515
NCT02101515N/ACompleted

Randomized Control Trial of Usual Labor Versus Extended Second Stage

Thomas Jefferson University·interventional·Posted Apr 2, 2014·Updated Oct 26, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Length of Second Stage for Labor Complications. Completed, enrolled 78 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that extending the second stage of labor beyond current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists suggestions can reduce the cesarean delivery rate. The cesarean delivery rate in the United States is around 30 percent. This is a number that continues to be increasing over the last few decades and will continue to climb. Each subsequent cesarean section puts the mother and baby at increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, bowel and bladder injury, abnormal placentation, febrile morbidity and death. The most common reason for a cesarean delivery is a repeat cesarean delivery. One way to reduce this number is to prevent the first cesarean delivery. The aim of this study is evaluate if extending the second stage of labor affects the cesarean delivery rate and subsequent perinatal morbidity.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 2, 2014
Enrollment StartMar 1, 2014
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 12.3 years ago

Interventions

Length of Second Stageother

The experimental group will have one additional hour in the second stage of labor