CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 150 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Endovascular recanalisationprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02126085
NCT02126085N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment

University Hospital Heidelberg·interventional·Posted Apr 29, 2014·Updated May 24, 2016

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Endovascular recanalisation for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Completed, enrolled 150 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment Trial (SIESTA) is a prospective, randomised controlled, monocentric, two-armed, comparative trial. Patients are randomized 1 : 1 to either non-intubated state or to intubated state for endovascular stroke treatment. Otherwise, no principal differences in intensive care treatment are intended, and standard operating procedures are applied to ensure uniform management decisions in fields such as ventilation, sedation, cardio-vascular and cerebral monitoring and management.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAcute Ischemic Stroke
CountriesGermany
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 29, 2014
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2014
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2016
Study CompletionMay 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 12.2 years ago

Interventions

Endovascular recanalisationprocedure

Endovascular recanalisation by mechanical thrombectomy with e.g. stent retriever device, possibly following intravenous thrombolysis within a "bridging concept"