At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Endotracheal Tube In Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopy Surgery
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Endotracheal Tube and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme for Anaesthesia. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Endotracheal Tube (ETT) is still preferred for laparoscopic surgeries because of the fear of pulmonary aspiration and inadequate ventilation. Laryngeal mask Supreme (LM-S) is a single use device and the presence of a drain tube allows to separate the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. We planned to compare ventilation parameters and gastric distension scores of with LM-S vs ETT during laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
ETT:Ruschelit, Teleflex Medical Snd. Bhd. Malaysia. Ref:112482
Before LM-S was inserted, to lubricate the surface in contact with the palate a water-based K-YTM gel (Johnson \& Johnson Ltd. Maidenhead, UK) without local anesthetic was applied to completely cover the LM-S cuff. Depending on the patient's body weight For \<50 kg, no. 3 Between 50-70 kg, no. 4 Between 70-100 kg, no. 5 LM-S (The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, Singapore) was inserted. Other Names: LM-S (The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, Singapore) serial number: 175030 lot: hmabw7