At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record

N/ACompleted· 60 enrolled

Drug / intervention

ocufilcon D +2 moredevice

Likely dose

Not stated in record

Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02131402

NCT02131402N/ACompleted

Compare CT.gov

Non-Dispensing Fitting Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Hydrogel vs. Silicone Hydrogel Sphere Design Contact Lenses

CooperVision, Inc.·interventional·Posted May 6, 2014·Updated Apr 4, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating ocufilcon D, omafilcon A, and 1 other intervention for Myopia. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The aim of this non-dispensing fitting study is to evaluate the subjective comfort, lens handling, lens fitting characteristics and visual acuity of different hydrogel lens designs versus silicone hydrogel lenses

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional

Allocation--

Masking--

Primary Purpose--

ConditionsMyopia

CountriesSpain

Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished

2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Enrollment StartMay 2014

Primary CompletionMay 2014

First PostedMay 2014

Study CompletionJun 2014

TodayJul 2026

First PostedMay 6, 2014

Enrollment StartMay 1, 2014

Primary CompletionMay 1, 2014

Study CompletionJun 1, 2014

TodayJul 2, 2026

Enrollment to primary: 0 daysPosted 12.2 years ago

Interventions

ocufilcon Ddevice

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (ocufilcon D) in the contra lateral eye.

omafilcon Adevice

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (omafilcon A) in the contra lateral eye.

methafilcon Adevice

Contralateral pair of study lenses. Test lens (enfilcon A) in one eye and a control lens (methafilcon A) in the contra lateral eye.