CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 59 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Y mesh +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02156687
NCT02156687N/ACompleted

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle Y Mesh vs. Restorelle Dual Flat Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

The Cleveland Clinic·interventional·Posted Jun 5, 2014·Updated Nov 24, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Y mesh and Dual flat mesh for Prolapse. Completed, enrolled 59 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh versus the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Hypothesis: Suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh will be faster than when using the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsProlapse
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJun 5, 2014
Enrollment StartApr 14, 2014
Primary CompletionNov 7, 2019
Study CompletionApr 1, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 5.6 yearsPosted 12.1 years ago

Interventions

Y meshdevice

Y mesh

Dual flat meshdevice

Dual flat mesh