CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 100 enrolled
Drug / intervention
McGrath MAC enhanced direct laryngoscopedevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02250521
NCT02250521N/ACompleted

McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope - To View or Not To View?

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston·interventional·Posted Sep 26, 2014·Updated Nov 9, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating McGrath MAC enhanced direct laryngoscope for Intubation; Difficult. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study was designed to determine the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation with the McGRATH™ MAC laryngoscope using direct visualization in patients with known difficult airways, as well as exploring the possibility of identifying a particular direct Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade view where indirect (video) visualization can be most beneficial during laryngoscopy and intubation.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsMedtronic - MITG

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 26, 2014
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2014
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 11.8 years ago

Interventions

McGrath MAC enhanced direct laryngoscopedevice

The McGRATH® MAC enhanced direct laryngoscope (EDL) combines the familiarity of direct laryngoscopy with an inline video camera for an enhanced view. All 100 patients will be intubated using the McGRATH® MAC video laryngoscope, either through direct or indirect vision laryngoscopy. The LCD monitor of the McGRATH™ MAC was initially covered; if the anesthesiologist visualized a modified C-L grade 1-3 view, the patient was intubated utilizing this direct view. If the anesthesiologist observed a modified C-L grade 4 view during their initial direct view, the patient was intubated using the indirect method. If intubation via direct laryngoscopy was unsuccessful on the first attempt, the patient was intubated using the indirect view. If both methods of laryngoscopy were unsuccessful, the rescue intubation technique was performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist.