CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 24 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02255214
NCT02255214N/ACompleted

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Hemochron Signature Elite Point of Care Micro Coagulation Instrument Compared With Laboratory Assay

NHS Lothian·observational·Posted Oct 2, 2014·Updated Jan 30, 2026

In Brief

An observational study for Blood Coagulation Tests. Completed, enrolled 24 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Central Neuraxial Blockade (CNB) is commonly used in anaesthetics. It has several advantages over a general anaesthetic however contraindications include coagulopathy. Guidelines suggest a CNB should not be undertaken with an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.5 or greater. A common cause of an elevated INR is warfarin therapy and regular monitoring of its effects is required. The Hemochron Signature Elite is a portable micro coagulation system that can be used as a point of care (POC) anticoagulation monitoring device. Marketing is focussed on its accuracy, convenience and efficiency in delivering a coagulation result. This study will assess the accuracy of this device in calculating the International Normalised Ratio (INR) result. This will be compared to another INR result obtained on the same sample via the current gold standard testing equipment in the Royal Infirmary Edinburgh (RIE) laboratories. The study will include patients presenting for surgery who have had their warfarin therapy stopped within the previous 7 days. Patients on warfarin therapy requiring surgery are currently identified in preoperative assessment clinics, on average 12 weeks prior to their date of surgery. Anecdotally there appears to be a difference between the 'expected' and actual INR when a POC device is used. Concern exists that patients may be inappropriately denied the potential benefits of central neural blockade (CNB) if a POC device provides a falsely high result, or conversely the investigators may be proceeding with CNB in patients with an unacceptably high INR if POC provides a falsely low result. There is also the possibility of improving hospital efficiency using this device as it provides a result much faster than the laboratory.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited Kingdom
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 2, 2014
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2013
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.6 yearsPosted 11.8 years ago