CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 7 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Change of PMT settingdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02255643
NCT02255643N/ACompleted

The Relationship Between Motor Threshold and Effective Stimulation Threshold During Motor Cortex Stimulation

University of British Columbia·interventional·Posted Oct 2, 2014·Updated Dec 18, 2014

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Change of PMT setting for Neuropathic Pain. Completed, enrolled 7 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with neuropathic pain not responsive to medication. An electrode is placed on the surface of the brain and connected to a programmable battery in the chest. The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. A too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while a too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation parameters in patients already implanted with a motor cortex stimulation who have received good pain relief. The actual voltage may vary widely between patients but the investigators feel that there may be an "ideal" voltage if it is measured as a percentage of motor threshold (PMT). If motor threshold is the stimulation voltage that can evoke a muscle contraction then a PMT = 80% would be a voltage that was eighty percent of that value. Although the actual voltage may be widely different between patients, the percentage needed may be very similar. The investigators therefore plan to measure the effect of different percentages of PMT in patients already being treated with motor cortex stimulation. Systematic analysis of the findings of this study might help the individual participant and future patients to better programming and less side effects.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesCanada
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 2, 2014
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2014
Primary CompletionNov 1, 2014
Study CompletionDec 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1 monthPosted 11.8 years ago

Interventions

Change of PMT settingdevice

The patients current motor threshold is determined and the patient is set to a new PMT (= new treatment arm)