At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordPhase 4Completed· 120 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Chloroprocaine +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Low Epidural Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Multi-centre Clinical Trial in China
In Brief
A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Chloroprocaine and Lidocaine for Anesthesia. Completed, enrolled 120 participants.
Detailed Summary
Chinese made chloroprocaine has a rapid onset time, effective methodology, can last for a short time, provides fast motor recovery and causes no significant side effects.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAnesthesia
Countries--
Collaborators--
Timeline
Phase 4CompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
Enrollment StartJan 2008
Primary CompletionApr 2008
Study CompletionJun 2008
First PostedNov 2014
TodayJul 2026
First PostedNov 11, 2014
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2008
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2008
Study CompletionJun 1, 2008
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 monthsPosted 11.6 years ago
Interventions
Chloroprocainedrug
60 patients undergoing lower limb or lower abdominal surgery from three hospitals in China received 3% chloroprocaine.
Lidocainedrug
60 patients undergoing lower limb or lower abdominal surgery from three hospitals in China received 2% lidocaine.