CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 236 enrolled
Drug / intervention
ethyl alcochol, chlorhexidine and moisturizers +2 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02294604
NCT02294604N/ACompleted

The Antiseptic Outcome of Traditional Hand Scrubbing Versus Hand Rubbing in Surgical Room

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital·interventional·Posted Nov 19, 2014·Updated Mar 13, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating ethyl alcochol, chlorhexidine and moisturizers, chlorhexidine, and 1 other intervention for Hand Disinfection. Completed, enrolled 236 participants.

Detailed Summary

Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques to reduce surgical site infection. The traditional surgical antisepsis involves scrubbing the skin with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate. Recently, a waterless surgical hand rub formulation containing 61% ethyl alcochol, 1% chlorhexidine and moisturizers was developed to provide a comparable antiseptic effect. The investigators perform a randomized controlled trial to compare the antiseptic effectiveness of the waterless hand rubbing, the classic surgical handwashing with povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine solutions.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 19, 2014
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2015
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1 monthPosted 11.6 years ago

Interventions

ethyl alcochol, chlorhexidine and moisturizersdevice

chlorhexidinedevice

povidone-iodinedevice