CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 152 enrolled
Drug / intervention
peripherally inserted central catheter +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02314520
NCT02314520N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center·interventional·Posted Dec 11, 2014·Updated Jul 19, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter for PICC and 5 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 152 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPICC, Central Venous Catheter, Central Line, Neuro ICU, Neuroscience ICU, CVC
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 11, 2014
Enrollment StartJul 13, 2015
Primary CompletionDec 7, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.4 yearsPosted 11.6 years ago

Interventions

peripherally inserted central catheterdevice

Any complication associated with central access

centrally inserted central catheterdevice

Central access not associated with any complication