CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 66 enrolled
Drug / intervention
King Vision video laryngoscope +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02316769
NCT02316769N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision Video Laryngoscope in Adult Patients.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center·interventional·Posted Dec 15, 2014·Updated Mar 10, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating King Vision video laryngoscope and McGrath MAC video laryngoscope for Video Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users. Completed, enrolled 66 participants.

Detailed Summary

In this study, the investigators compare the effectiveness of two relatively new video laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC (Covidien, Dublin Ireland) and the King Vision (King Systems, Noblesville, IN), by practitioners experienced in airway management but with limited exposure to these two devices. Our hypothesis was that, the McGrath MAC device would require fewer intubation attempts and shorter intubation times than the King Vision when performed by novice users.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsVideo Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 15, 2014
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2012
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2013
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 11.5 years ago

Interventions

King Vision video laryngoscopeprocedure

Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

McGrath MAC video laryngoscopeprocedure

Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope