CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 8 enrolled
Drug / intervention
modified dentoalveolar distractordevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02332421
NCT02332421N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Comparison Of The Short-Term Therapeutic Effects Between Two Distractors Used For The Retraction Of Maxillary Canines By Dentoalveolar Distraction Osteogenesis

Damascus University·interventional·Posted Jan 6, 2015·Updated Sep 29, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating modified dentoalveolar distractor for Orthodontic Patients Requiring Canine Retraction. Completed, enrolled 8 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

In this study, two distractors will be used to retract maxillary canines into the extraction sites. The first distractor is a modified Hyrax expander with two arms soldered to two bands connected to a canine and a molar; and the second one is a similar to the first one but with the addition of a third arm. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the two distractors in terms of: final position of the canine, canine pulp vitality, molars' anchorage, patient's acceptance to the appliance.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsOrthodontic Patients Requiring Canine Retraction
CountriesSyria
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 6, 2015
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2014
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2015
Study CompletionSep 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.2 yearsPosted 11.5 years ago

Interventions

modified dentoalveolar distractordevice

Here, the modified distractor is going to be used when retracting the canine.