CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 4,162 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Follow upother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02376777
NCT02376777N/ACompleted

Comparison of Accidents and Their Circumstances With Oral Anticoagulants. The CACAO Study

CNGE IRMG Association·observational·Posted Mar 3, 2015·Updated Jun 28, 2017

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Follow up for Cardiovascular Complications and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 4,162 participants across 33 sites.

Detailed Summary

Differences in efficacy and safety between new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in real practice remain uncertain. The few existing ambulatory studies did not answer all NOAC specific issues, such as prescription habits and motives, patients characteristics, biological monitoring, as well as the occurrence of major and minor thromboembolic events, especially in France where warfarin is less frequently prescribed. Therefore, in order to describe clinical and follow up characteristics of patients receiving oral anticoagulants, the investigators will set up a national prospective cohort to compare the occurrence of thromboembolic events between VKA and NOAC in primary care.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesFrance

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 3, 2015
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2014
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2016
Study CompletionJun 1, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.7 yearsPosted 11.3 years ago

Interventions

Follow upother

each three months during one year of follow up, general practioners will entered health data in database (hemorrhagic events, changes of medication, biological data...)