CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 564 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Printed Education Material +2 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02392143
NCT02392143N/ACompleted

Promoting CRC Screening in a Hard-To-Reach, Low-Income Minority Population

Teachers College, Columbia University·interventional·Posted Mar 18, 2015·Updated Mar 18, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Printed Education Material, Academic Detailing, and 1 other intervention for Colorectal Cancer. Completed, enrolled 564 participants.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study (Healthy Colon Project II) is to evaluate different educational approaches for increasing rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a hard-to-reach urban minority population with health insurance.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
Countries--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 18, 2015
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2009
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 5.7 yearsPosted 11.3 years ago

Interventions

Printed Education Materialother

The printed education material described the importance of early detection and prevention, risk factors, and the importance of talking to your doctor about CRC screening. The PEM highlighted colonoscopy as being the only test that can identify and prevent CRC and described how to prepare for a colonoscopy beginning seven days prior to the test \[18\]. The PEM also described other CRC screening tests, including the FOBT, FIT, sigmoidoscopy, barium enema and virtual colonoscopy.

Academic Detailingother

Academic detailing (AD) involved an in-person visit from a member of the research team who attempted to communicate strategies for improving CRC screening uptake in the practice's patient panel. A brief description of the RCT was followed by a semi-structured interview assessing usual practice regarding CRC screening referral and follow up. The direction of the discussion was guided by PCP responses. A variety of resources were provided. Specific directives were following up to make sure patients had made appointments with a gastroenterologist and offering home stool tests. The detailer attempted to elicit a verbal commitment to do at least one new thing to strengthen the probability that patients would be screened.

Academic Detailing+Telephone Educationother

PCPs received AD as described in the Academic Detailing arm. In addition, participants received tailored telephone education (TTE) which focused on identifying and addressing barriers that might impede screening. Verbal commitments were elicited to speak with their PCP and make an appointment for a colonoscopy, or request a home stool test, as appropriate. Follow-up calls assessed progress towards achieving goals.