CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 205 enrolled
Drug / intervention
orotracheal intubationdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02395445
NCT02395445N/ACompleted

A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management: a Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial

Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos·interventional·Posted Mar 23, 2015·Updated Nov 7, 2016

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating orotracheal intubation for Endotracheal Intubation. Completed, enrolled 205 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Endotracheal intubation is usually required to allow unrestricted surgical approach. The Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard method. However in certain situations as difficult airway this technique is ineffective and poorly tolerated by the patient. Fiberoptic intubation is the gold standard in this scenario, however sometimes it is not possible due to failure or unavailability, so alternatives are needed. The TotalTrack (MedComflow SA, Barcelona, Spain) has been designed specifically for the airway management. However, despite its use in clinical practice, there are no comparative studies regarding direct laryngoscopy

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSpain
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 23, 2015
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2015
Primary CompletionNov 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.2 yearsPosted 11.3 years ago

Interventions

orotracheal intubationdevice