At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Effects of the Herbst Appliance With Skeletal Anchorage or Dental Anchorage, and Twin-Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage, Herbst appliance with dental anchorage, and 1 other intervention for Malocclusion, Angle Class II. Active but no longer recruiting, targeting 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the Herbst appliance with indirect skeletal anchorage in mini-implants is capable of preventing excessive inclination of the lower incisors at the end of the treatment when compared to the Herbst appliance with dental anchorage and Twin-Block appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion and overjet ≥ 6 mm.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Group treated with the Herbst appliance with indirect skeletal anchorage in mini-implants.
Group treated with the conventional Herbst appliance with dental anchorage.
Group treated with Twin-Block appliance