CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 10,347 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Prioritized Clinical Decision Supportbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02451670
NCT02451670N/ACompleted

Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in Adults With Serious Mental Illness Using an Electronic Medical Record-based Clinical Decision Support

HealthPartners Institute·interventional·Posted May 22, 2015·Updated Nov 5, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Prioritized Clinical Decision Support for Chronic Disease and 4 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 10,347 participants across 3 sites.

Detailed Summary

This purpose of this study is to adapt, implement and test the ability of a sophisticated point-of-care electronic health record-based clinical decision support that identifies and prioritizes all available evidence-based treatment options to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with serious mental illness.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 22, 2015
Enrollment StartJan 20, 2016
Primary CompletionSep 19, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.7 yearsPosted 11.1 years ago

Interventions

Prioritized Clinical Decision Supportbehavioral

After entry of blood pressure data at all primary care visits, relevant electronic health record data were automatically extracted, encrypted and processed through Web-based clinical algorithms that determined if the patient met intervention eligibility criteria. In intervention clinics, the rooming staff received a best practice alert and printed patient and primary care provider versions of the clinical decision support that identified evidence-based treatment options for any uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors and prioritized treatment recommendations based on potential cardiovascular risk reduction. Cardiovascular risk factors addressed in study participants were control of lipids, blood pressure, weight, tobacco, glucose and appropriate aspirin use. In control clinics, rooming staff did not receive a best practice alert and patients and primary care providers did not receive and were not able to access the clinical decision support.