At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparative Analysis Between 2% and Articaine Articaine 4%, Both With 1: 200,000 Epinephrine: Evaluation of Anesthetics Efficacy, Intraoperative Bleeding and Hemodynamic Parameters in Extraction of Lower Third Molars
In Brief
A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Surgery with 2%Articaine first, then Surgery with 4% Articaine and Surgery with 4%Articaine first, then Surgery with 2% Articaine for Impacted Third Molar Tooth and Adverse Reaction to Other Local Anesthetics. Completed, enrolled 50 participants.
Detailed Summary
The present clinical trial randomized compared the clinical efficacy of the local anesthetics articaine in two concentrations, 2% and 4%, in association with 1:200,000 adrenaline, for the removal of lower third molars. Onset, duration of postoperative analgesia, duration of anesthetic action on soft tissues, intraoperative bleeding, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative mouth opening and wound healing at the 7th postoperative day were evaluated. For this purpose, 50 healthy volunteers underwent removal of symmetrically positioned lower third molars, in two separate appointments (one to two months apart), under local anesthesia with either articaine 2% or 4% (both with 1:200,000 adrenaline) in a double-blind, randomized and crossed manner.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
First Intervention (1 day - third molar surgery with infiltration of one cartridge of 2% articaíne), Washout (1-2 months), and Second Intervention (1 day - third molar surgery with infiltration of one cartridge of 4% articaíne)
First Intervention (1 day - third molar surgery with infiltration of one cartridge of 4% articaíne), Washout (1-2 months), and Second Intervention (1 day - third molar surgery with infiltration of one cartridge of 2% articaíne)