CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 3Completed· 1,950 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP, NO prophylactic pancreatic stent placement +1 moreother
Likely dose
Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP, NO prophylactic pancreatic stent placementfrom record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02476279
NCT02476279Phase 3Completed

Stent vs. Indomethacin for Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: The SVI Trial

Medical University of South Carolina·interventional·Posted Jun 19, 2015·Updated Jun 12, 2024

In Brief

A Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP, NO prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP AND prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Completed, enrolled 1,950 participants across 20 sites in 2 countries.

Detailed Summary

Background: Pancreatitis is the most frequent complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), accounting for substantial morbidity, occasional mortality, and increased health care expenditures. Until recently, the only effective method of preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) had been prophylactic pancreatic stent placement (PSP), an intervention that is costly, time consuming, technically challenging, and potentially dangerous. The investigators recently reported the results of a large randomized controlled trial demonstrating that rectal indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, reduced the risk of pancreatitis after ERCP in high-risk patients, most of whom (\>80%) had received a pancreatic stent. Secondary analysis of this RCT suggested that subjects who received indomethacin alone were less likely to develop PEP than those who received a pancreatic stent alone or the combination of indomethacin and stent, even after adjusting for underlying differences in subject risk. If indomethacin were to obviate the need for PSP, major clinical and cost benefits in ERCP practice could be realized. Objective: To assess whether rectal indomethacin alone is non-inferior to the combination of rectal indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk cases. Methods: Comparative effectiveness multi-center non-inferiority trial of rectal indomethacin alone vs. the combination of rectal indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients. One thousand four hundred and thirty subjects at elevated risk for PEP who would normally receive a pancreatic stent for prophylaxis will be randomized to indomethacin alone or the combination of indomethacin and PSP. The proportion of patients developing PEP and moderate-severe PEP will be compared. In addition, the investigators will establish a quality-assured central repository of biological specimens obtained from study participants, permitting future translational research elucidating the molecular and genetic mechanisms of PEP, as well as the mechanisms by which non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prevent this complication.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesCanada, United States

Timeline

Phase 3CompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJun 19, 2015
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2015
Primary CompletionJan 25, 2023
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7.4 yearsPosted 11.0 years ago

Interventions

Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP, NO prophylactic pancreatic stent placementother

Indomethacin 100 mg rectally immediately after ERCP AND prophylactic pancreatic stent placementother