At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Terms of First Pass Intubation Success Rate, Intubation Time, Glottic View Time, and Complications Related to Laryngoscopy
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope for Respiratory Failure and Intubation. Completed, enrolled 388 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The investigators studied the efficiency of Macintosh laryngoscope and the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients scheduled for general anesthesia. Best Cormack-Lehane score obtained, glottic view time, intubation time, time to ventilation, correlation between the Mallampati classification and the Cormack-Lehane grades, and complications related to laryngoscopy and intubation has been investigated.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Using a Macintosh laryngoscope, time to glottic view, best Cormack-Lehane grade, time to intubation, time to first ventilation has been recorded.
Using a King Vision video laryngoscope, time to glottic view, best Cormack-Lehane grade, time to intubation, time to first ventilation has been recorded.