CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 143 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Optilene LP mesh +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02500056
NCT02500056N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Single-centre Single-blinded Randomised Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Tartu University Hospital·interventional·Posted Jul 16, 2015·Updated Jul 11, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Optilene LP mesh and Ultrapro mesh for Inguinal Hernia. Completed, enrolled 143 participants.

Detailed Summary

The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsInguinal Hernia
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJul 16, 2015
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2011
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2012
Study CompletionApr 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 11.0 years ago

Interventions

Optilene LP meshdevice

Lichtenstein hernioplasty

Ultrapro meshdevice

Lichtenstein hernioplasty