At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 10 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Fiberglass Composite foot +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparative Performance of Dynamic Elastic Response Feet
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Fiberglass Composite foot and Carbon Fiber Composite Foot for Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral. Completed, enrolled 10 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the functional performance of individuals with transtibial amputation using two types of prosthetic foot designs: carbon fiber vs. fiberglass composite.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsTranstibial Amputation - Unilateral
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJun 2015
First PostedSep 2015
Primary CompletionDec 2015
Study CompletionMay 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedSep 7, 2015
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2015
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2015
Study CompletionMay 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 10.8 years ago
Interventions
Fiberglass Composite footdevice
The Rush foot is a fiberglass composite energy storage and return prosthetic foot.
Carbon Fiber Composite Footdevice
All types of currently commercially available carbon fiber energy storage and return prosthetic feet will be considered appropriate.