CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 16 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Level of pneumoperitoneum 12-9-6 mmHg +2 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02545270
NCT02545270N/ACompleted

Validation of a Subjective Rating Scale for Assessment of the Surgical Workspace in Laparoscopy

Herlev Hospital·interventional·Posted Sep 9, 2015·Updated Jun 17, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Level of pneumoperitoneum 12-9-6 mmHg, Level of pneumoperitoneum 11-8-5 mmHg, and 1 other intervention for Hernia, Inguinal. Completed, enrolled 16 participants across 2 sites.

Detailed Summary

It is of great importance to obtain optimal surgical conditions for the surgeon in order to increase patient safety. The effect of different interventions on surgical conditions has been assessed by various surgeon-assessed rating scales. A 5-point surgical rating scale has previously been tested in a proof-of-concept trial - but not validated - during radical retropubic prostatectomy by asking different surgeons to evaluate the surgical workspace using video sequences. In an ongoing study (The Hernia Study, Trial registration NCT02247466) performed by investigators group, investigators are using a 5-point scale to rate the surgical workspace during laparoscopic ventral herniotomy with or without neuromuscular blockade. This scale is based on previously used scales by already published studies and has a description connected to each point. To the authors' knowledge the scale has never been validated in a laparoscopic setting, where the intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperitoneum can have a great influence on visualization. In fact, to investigators knowledge, no validated surgeon-assessed rating scale regarding the surgical workspace during laparoscopic surgery does exists. Purpose: Primary aim: To validate a 5-point rating scale by investigating the inter-rater agreement of evaluations of the surgical workspace at different intra-abdominal pressures. Using intra-abdominal video recordings. Secondary aims: To validate a 10-point rating scale by investigating the inter-rater agreement of evaluations of the surgical workspace at different intra-abdominal pressures. To test the agreement between the two rating scales. To assess which of the two rating scales has the highest inter-rater agreement To assess the intra-rater agreement of both rating scales. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesize that the 5-point rating scale has an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) \> 0.6., validated by video-sequences obtained during laparoscopic surgery.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesDenmark

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 9, 2015
Enrollment StartMar 1, 2016
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2016
Study CompletionAug 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 monthsPosted 10.8 years ago

Interventions

Level of pneumoperitoneum 12-9-6 mmHgprocedure

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (12-9-6 mmHg) during desufflation.

Level of pneumoperitoneum 11-8-5 mmHgprocedure

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (11-8-5 mmHg) during desufflation.

Level of pneumoperitoneum 10-7-4 mmHgprocedure

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (10-7-4 mmHg) during desufflation.