At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Different Methods of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Anesthetized and Intubated Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating conventional technique, head in the lateral position technique, and 2 other interventions for Disorder of Abdomen. Completed, enrolled 200 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the first attempt and overall success rate of different techniques for insertion of nasogastric tube. Secondary aim is to investigate the difference of the duration of insertion using the selected technique, complications during insertion such as kinking, knotting, mucosal bleeding
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
the nasogastric tube will be inserted gently through a selected nostril with the head being maintained in the neutral position.
the patient's head will be turned to the right lateral position. Nasogastric tube will be inserted through the right nostril without any maneuvers of the neck.
Nasogastric tube will be inserted the trimmed 7.5 mm internal diameter endotracheal tube what cut proximal end with sterile scissors and endotracheal tube will be advanced blindly into the oral cavity to a depth of approximately 18 cm without laryngoscope together the nasogastric tube.
Nasogastric tube was inserted transnasally and advanced into esophagus under direct vision.