CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 4,567 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02560194
NCT02560194N/ACompleted

Evaluation of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening as an Adjunct to the National FOBT Screening Programme in Scotland - A Random Evaluation

University of Dundee·interventional·Posted Sep 25, 2015·Updated Mar 23, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and Fecal occult blood test for Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Adenoma. Completed, enrolled 4,567 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) consistently demonstrates reductions in deaths from colorectal cancer of around 16% and gFOBT screening is now routine in all four countries of the United Kingdom. However, gFOBT has significant limitations and is associated with a substantial interval cancer rate in the region of 50 %, indicating a severe deficiency in sensitivity for cancer. Additionally, as the majority of colorectal cancers arise from pre-existing adenomas, it is important for colorectal screening programmes to detect adenomas in order to reduce the incidence of the disease as well as the associated mortality. Although gFOBT does detect some adenomas, most randomised trials have not demonstrated a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence. Also, FOBT screening tends to under-detect cancers in women and it is relatively insensitive for rectal cancer when compared with colon cancer. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), between the ages of 55 and 65 years, has been shown to bring about a significant reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. In addition, and most importantly, after a period of four years a significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence was observed. FS does not suffer from low specificity since false positives do not occur, and there is independent evidence that it is more sensitive than a single gFOBT. In addition, FS is ideally suited to detecting rectal cancers and adenomas, and it is unlikely that there would be a gender difference in the sensitivity. Single FS has not been compared with biennial FOBT and there is no information regarding the utility of FS in a population that has already been exposed to FOBT screening. It is hypothesised that offering a combination of gFOBT and FS would provide an enhanced screening algorithm that would be associated with better outcomes than gFOBT alone. In order to test this hypothesis a randomised evaluation pilot study of FS screening integrated into the current gFOBT Screening Programme, will be carried out in those around age 60, as this appears to be the age at which adenoma prevalence peaks.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited Kingdom
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 25, 2015
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2014
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2016
Study CompletionDec 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.9 yearsPosted 10.8 years ago

Interventions

Flexible Sigmoidoscopyprocedure

Examination of the rectal and distal colon by means of a flexible endoscope

Fecal occult blood testother

Test for hemoglobin in faeces