CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 2Completed· 22 enrolled
Drug / intervention
3D augmented realitydevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02582216
NCT02582216Phase 2Completed

3D Augmented Reality Mirror Visual Feedback Therapy Applied to the Treatment of Persistent, Unilateral Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain: A Preliminary Study

Erasme University Hospital·interventional·Posted Oct 21, 2015·Updated Aug 24, 2020

In Brief

A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating 3D augmented reality for Neuralgia. Completed, enrolled 22 participants.

Detailed Summary

This study has two objectives. First, to introduce a new virtual reality method that incorporates the mechanisms used in mirror visual feedback through a three-dimensional (3D) augmented virtual reality system. Second, to evaluate the efficiency of this new method on a convenience sample of patients presenting with unresolved neuropathic pain (CRPS, PLP, plexopathy, stroke) who were not responding adequately to both pharmaceutical management and traditional mirror therapy.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsNeuralgia
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 2CompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 21, 2015
Enrollment StartMar 1, 2013
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2013
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 10.7 years ago

Interventions

3D augmented realitydevice

Each treatment period included a 3DARS (3D augmented reality system)training session.All 3DARS training sessions were performed in the same quiet room under the supervision of the same single investigator.The 3DARS training session protocol included two virtual training procedures. The first virtual training procedure consisted of applying a vertical virtual mirror to the display screen, where the non-affected side of the patient's body (such as the right) was symmetrically duplicated by a vertical axis on the affected side (such as the left).The second virtual training procedure consisted of flipping the 3D image horizontally along a vertical axis. This allowed patients to observe the reflection of their non-affected upper extremity as if it was the affected one.