At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 98 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Mini-arc +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Transobturator Versus Single Incision Slings: 1 Year Results of a Randomized Control Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Mini-arc and Monarc for Urinary Incontinence, Stress. Completed, enrolled 98 participants.
Detailed Summary
A randomized control trial to compare the efficacy of the single incision mini-sling to the transobturator sling
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsUrinary Incontinence, Stress
Countries--
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartNov 2008
Primary CompletionJan 2011
First PostedNov 2015
TodayJul 2026
First PostedNov 6, 2015
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2008
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.2 yearsPosted 10.7 years ago
Interventions
Mini-arcdevice
We will place a single incision sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence
Monarcdevice
We will place a transobturator sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence