CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 18 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Immediate implants with nanobone graft +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02613663
NCT02613663N/ACompleted

Evaluation of Surgical Time, Post-operative Pain and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth: Randomized Controlled Trials.

Cairo University·interventional·Posted Nov 24, 2015·Updated May 16, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Immediate implants with nanobone graft and immediate implants with autogenous bone graft for Immediate Implant With Bone Graft. Completed, enrolled 18 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

A successful implant therapy require appropriate hard and soft tissue, perfect implant position, appropriate alveolar ridge architecture and integration of the implant. after tooth extraction bone resorption takes place and affect the quantity and quality of the bone resulting in inadequate bone volume for implant placement and future prosthetic restoration and impair the esthetic, so insertion of implant immediately following tooth extraction reduce bone loss and enhance esthetics.the fresh socket of extracted tooth is wider than the implant diameter and the distance between the implant and the bone called Peri-implant gap which influence the stability, osseointegration of the implants and esthetics. using bone graft in this gap between bone and implant enhance osseointegration and post-operative healing. autogenous bone graft considered the gold standard graft material for filling defects as it is osteogenic,osseoconductive and osseoinductive, however this approach obtained from the primary donor site for harvesting bone in the oral cavity which requires longer surgical procedure and produce not enough bone volume. there are several post-operative complication may happen as donor site morbidity and swelling,discomfort and pain, so alternative treatment has been suggested using biomaterials to fill the gap and reduce adverse effect of autogenous grafts.Several studies evaluate the success rate of implants with "autogenous" bone graft versus other synthetic guided bone regeneration materials. Nano porous grafting material as a new synthetic material "nanobone" nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite embedded in a porous silica gel matrix has oseoconductive and biomimetic properties integrate with the host bone. the sub-micron modification in bone substitutes enhance osteogenic property. the objective of this study is to measure surgical time, pain, implant stability and marginal bone loss in immediate implant placement with using autogenous bone graft versus nanobone graft.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesEgypt
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 24, 2015
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2016
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 10.6 years ago

Interventions

Immediate implants with nanobone graftprocedure

Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use nanobone graft to fill the gap.

immediate implants with autogenous bone graftprocedure

Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use autogenous bone graft to fill the gap.