CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 8 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cotton Pellet +3 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02625597
NCT02625597N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

An In Vivo Assessment of the Effects of Using Different Implant Abutment Occluding Materials on Implant Microleakage and the Peri-Implant Microbiome

Stony Brook University·interventional·Posted Dec 9, 2015·Updated Dec 9, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Cotton Pellet, Polytetrafluoroethylene Tape, and 2 other interventions for Peri-Implantitis and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 8 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine what effect, if any, do different dental materials used to seal the prosthetic screw channels of implant supported restorations have on dental implant health parameters and microbiology.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPeri-Implantitis, Dental Implant Failed, Dental Implant Failure Nos
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 9, 2015
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2013
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2015
Study CompletionJun 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.2 yearsPosted 10.6 years ago

Interventions

Cotton Pelletdevice

Polytetrafluoroethylene Tapedevice

Synthetic Foamdevice

Polyvinylsiloxanedevice