CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 80 enrolled
Drug / intervention
conventional technique +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02634047
NCT02634047N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Use of McGrath Videolaryngoscope to Assist Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Insertion in Intubated Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Antalya Training and Research Hospital·interventional·Posted Dec 17, 2015·Updated Dec 17, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating conventional technique and videolaryngoscope technique for Other Complications of Surgical and Medical Procedures. Completed, enrolled 80 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the first attempt and overall success rate of different techniques for insertion of transesophageal echocardiography. Secondary aim is to investigate the difference of the duration of insertion using the selected technique, complications during insertion such as oropharyngeal mucosal injury and hematoma.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsOther Complications of Surgical and Medical Procedures
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 17, 2015
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2015
Primary CompletionNov 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 monthsPosted 10.5 years ago

Interventions

conventional techniquedevice

transesophageal echocardiography probe was inserted using a traditional blind insertion technique.

videolaryngoscope techniquedevice

transesophageal echocardiography probe was advanced into esophagus under direct vision using videolaryngoscope